The beauty of being a lady today is being able to believe for self. {Unfortunately, some ladies are threatened by this right of being and make a point to discourage other ladies from exercising this personal flexibility.|Some ladies are threatened by this right of being and make a point to discourage other ladies from exercising this personal flexibility.}
Recently I got an e-mail asking for my assistance to prohibit a specific XXX actress from performing in Houston due to the fact that (the emailer’s thinking not mine) this female and ladies like her were twisting the message, “ladies can work any task” and for motivating sex crimes by allowing themselves to be seen as sex items. As to the first argument of the emailer, isn’t really this what ladies have been requiring all along, to be able to work where they have a interest and ability?
I scatched my head in astonishment to the comments expressed by this female believing she can make life decisions for other ladies so regarding prevent them from making choices she don’t authorize.
I call it hypocrisy due to the fact that ladies have been stating for a very long time (a half and a century to be exact) they are capable of operating in any field of employment. {However when they do and it don’t suit some standard of what others think are acceptable occupations an annoying hissing starts.|When they do and it don’t fit into some standard of what others think are acceptable occupations an annoying hissing starts.}
Personally I would not want to earn my living undressing on or off video camera, but that’s how I feel. I’m naying or not yeaing “adult” occupations, they are legal and ladies can choose them without harrassment from other ladies if they so desire.
The statement strippers and XXX starlets are the reason pedophilia and rapes take place is pardoning the predators. {Besides, blaming these ladies for crimes that have their orgins in antiquity, a time before Gentleman’s clubs and peep programs, is highly unfair.|Blaming these ladies for crimes that have their orgins in antiquity, a time before Gentleman’s clubs and peep programs, is highly unfair.} We can’t enable misdirected beings who viciously breach others to evade being held liable for their actions so we can pester ladies holding unfavorable tasks.
{The emailer mentioned that we, suggesting the neighborhood at large, must boycott this adult performer and others like her to save future generations of ladies from being exposed to their harmful messages. Funny, this very same female don’t appear to acknowledge those very same harmful messages are being promoted each hour of the day on the radio, tv, and yes within mainstream motion pictures. I didn’t hear this female vowing to boycott Basic Instinct (Sharon Stone) or Monster’s Ball (Halle Berry), when they rolled into local theater. Do you question why?|The emailer mentioned that we, suggesting the neighborhood at large, must boycott this adult performer and others like her to save future generations of ladies from being exposed to their harmful messages. I didn’t hear this female vowing to boycott Basic Instinct (Sharon Stone) or Monster’s Ball (Halle Berry), when they rolled into local film theaters.}
{I’ll tell you why. Quite possibly this female may have it in her mind if the nudity and specific sex acts are approved by MGM or Sony Pictures the end product would be acceptable, which could be another hypocrisy point. If she wanted to be consistent with her argument why didn’t she seek to prohibit all television shows, motion pictures and videos that expose young women to wanton sex acts and deceptive messages? {She would not because that would be considered ludicrous by the masses.|Because that would be considered ludicrous by the masses, she would not.}|Quite possibly this female may have it in her mind if the nudity and specific sex acts are approved by MGM or Sony Pictures the end product would be acceptable, which could be another hypocrisy point. If she desired to be constant with her argument why didn’t she seek to prohibit all television shows, motion pictures and videos that expose young ladies to wanton sex acts and deceptive messages?}
{Inspite of any criticism I may have of her intentions I understand deep down she means well but there are holes in her reasoning. If the argument for boycotting is, “this stripper (and ladies like her) enable themselves to be seen as sex items”, then I ask what’s the distinction between Halle being {nude and sexually provocative|sexually provocative and nude} for Sony Pictures and Ginger removing for Pimps Gentleman’s Club on the shady side of town? Personally, I don’t see a distinction between the two examples. Young women today are overwhelmed with sexual messages and barely any daily dosages of favorable images of womanhood (ladies who are emotionally and spiritually strong).|If the argument for boycotting is, “this stripper (and ladies like her) enable themselves to be seen as sex items”, then I ask what’s the distinction between Halle being {nude and sexually provocative|sexually provocative and nude} for Sony Pictures and Ginger removing for Pimps Gentleman’s Club on the shady side of town? Young ladies today are overwhelmed with sexual messages and barely any daily dosages of favorable images of womanhood (ladies who are emotionally and spiritually strong).}
Sidenote:
Do we really have the power to keep somebody from lusting after another (seeing them as a sex object)? The response is no!
My ideas to this female are, make a distinction with the next generation of ladies by living as a example, allowing younger ladies to see her confidence exuding from her individual. {Second of all, she ought to make a point to explain to those young women how essential it is to respect their bodies but not be summarized by them, after all they have more to use this world than simply external beauty.|She ought to make a point to explain to those young women how essential it is to respect their bodies but not be summed up by them, after all they have more to use this world than simply external beauty.} {Third, she ought to enable other ladies the right to make their on roads through life, does not matter if she feels those roads are ethically unsound or not, enable ladies to choose on their own.|She ought to enable other ladies the right to make their on roads through life, does not matter if she feels those roads are ethically unsound or not, enable ladies to choose for themselves.}
In a nutshell, boycotting ladies for taking advanatage of their God-given right, to believe on their own is not the response. Again, it does not matter if their options appear to be bad ones, the mere fact they have the ability and right to believe on their own need to be appreciated. Inspiring ladies to {acknowledge and value every element|value every element and acknowledge} of who they are, emotionally, spiritually, and yes physically will leave an incredibly undeniable legacy for the next generation of ladies.
If the argument for boycotting is, “this stripper (and ladies like her) enable themselves to be seen as sex items”, then I ask what’s the distinction between Halle being {nude and sexually provocative|sexually provocative and nude} for Sony Pictures and Ginger removing for Pimps Gentleman’s Club on the shady side of town? Young ladies today are overwhelmed with sexual messages and barely any daily dosages of favorable images of womanhood (ladies who are emotionally and spiritually strong).
My ideas to this female are, make a distinction with the next generation of ladies by living as a example, allowing younger ladies to see her confidence exuding from her individual. She ought to enable other ladies the right to make their on roads through life, does not matter if she feels those roads are ethically unsound or not, enable ladies to choose for themselves.
Inspiring ladies to {acknowledge and value every element|value every element and acknowledge} of who they are, emotionally, spiritually, and yes physically will leave an incredibly undeniable legacy for the next generation of ladies.
to find out more baditudecomic.com
Click